My First Ewa Michalak Order

Well, my bras arrived from Ewa Michalak. It took 15 days for them to reach me from Poland. That wasn’t bad, it’s about what people are reporting all over the place.

However, as soon as I opened the package, I knew something was wrong.

As I mentioned before, the Effuniak size calculator says that I am an 85GG. That’s the equivalent of a 38GG UK, which seemed just ridiculous to me: I wear a 34GG or a 32H in most bras, and I would positively swim in a 38GG. However, Ewa says that her bands are tighter than the bands on UK models, and many users agree. Opinions varied as to what size I ought to order: some people said go down one band size, some said go down a band AND a cup, or up a cup, etc. So, I ordered three bras: two of the CH Miętus, one in 85GG and one in 80H. I also ordered a HP Puder, in 80GG. I thought I had my bases covered there, especially since people say that Effuniak bands get tighter in higher cup sizes.

As soon as I opened the box, I was confronted with some very large bra cups. The 85GG Miętus was on top, and it was clearly too large. I pulled out all the bras to try on, hoping for a miracle. I didn’t get it.

Here is the smallest bra, the HP Puder, in 80GG, the equivalent of a 36GG:

First, the front view. You can see somewhat that the cup has empty spaces, and my breasts are not fully supported. And, in spite of the bra being oversized, the center gore wanted to ride out away from my chest.

Front view. Note the empty spaces near the armpits and cleavage.

 

From the top, you can see the emptiness more easily. I added arrows so you know what you are looking at.

The arrows point at the visible empty spaces.

The side view shows the concavity where my breast tissue should be convex. In other words, it should be round or a flat slope, but instead there is a collapsed-looking area because my breast is not supported in that area. Since the bra is squishing me in front, though, there’s some bulging.

More problem areas.

I should also note that, out of curiosity, I tried a tshirt on over the Puder. The seams were very visible. Though the seams are flatlocked, they create an indention into the foam of the cup, but are also bulky themselves; the result is a bulky seam sitting in a ditch. This creates a lot of very strong texture. As I wear tight tshirts most of the time, that would be a problem!

The straps, also, were very long, only partially adjustable, and very thin.

On the positive side, the Puder is a more intense pink in person. It is a very pretty bra in that respect.

One thing I found strange: Ewa Michalak says her bands are tighter than UK bands. With these bands, I found it to be the opposite. This “36” band was the same length, unstretched, as my 34 Fantasie bands, but it was much more stretchy. Each of the Effuniak bands easily stretched about 9 inches! With this in mind, I think I could actually go down a band size, rather than up.

Next up I tried the Miętus in 80H. It was also too large in both cup and band.

Too big! More empty spaces!

I took the next pic to emphasize how big the cups were.

You can see that the wire is too wide, even with a loose band.

I think the Miętus is a very pretty bra, and I am disappointed that it did not fit. However, it also suffered from the very stretchy band and narrow straps. In addition, the fabric just wasn’t as pretty in person. It just wasn’t super-nice fabric, not compared to the pretty fabrics in brands like Fantasie and even Panache. I did not try the Miętus on under a shirt, as it was so large it wouldn’t have mattered. However, it is worth nothing that the seams are less obtrusive than on the Puder: they are butted seams, and they are only on the green fabric, not the foam, so there is no “ditch” around them. I think they still might show though.

Just for the blog, I decided to try on the Miętus in 85GG. What a laugh! This is the size assigned to me by the Ewa Michalak calculator:

Way too big!

From the top, you can see how loose the cups are:

Quite roomy!

And the side view:

Yes, I know, the lighting is dismal. You should have seen it before Photoshop.

All the bras had in common the very stretchy bands. Also, the powernet in the wings seemed pretty thin and not very robust to me. In terms of quality of materials, I would say that they seem about the same level as a Cacique or Cleo bra. with one exception: the underwires seem to be very, very thickly cased, which I think would add to comfort. I also noted that the padding (in the cups) seemed much thicker than I had expected. The Effuniak website says that the foam is 3mm thick, but I think there must be more than two layers of fabric over that foam. I think that in a proper fit, the foam would be compressed and not so bulky, though. And it IS much less bulky than on an American or UK contour bra.

I measured these cups for the Bratabase before I put them on, and I found two curious things: one, without exception, the right-side cup on every bra was a little bigger than the left-side cup, both in width and depth. What’s that about? Two, I noticed that the smallest cup, in 80GG, was around the same size in width and depth as my other bras that do fit. The difference was in HEIGHT. Not just the length of the underwires (though they were very long) but also the actual height of the cup, in fabric. The cup comes up to and even above the tops of the underwires, and that means a lot of cup that I just couldn’t fill. This is why I think I could go down a size in cup as well as in band: the cups in EM are much more roomy than in any other bra I have ever tried.

What I found very frustrating about this experience is that I spent all this money (the bras themselves, shipping both ways) and came out of it without a single bra that fit me. In addition to that, if I had known that my size in Ewa Michalak bras would essentially be the same, or even smaller, than my UK size, I would not have ordered these three bras in the first place! My preference is for seamed cups with no padding. The only reason I decided to try these padded bras was because EM unpadded bras were supposedly not available in my size, and many people said that the padding was unobtrusive. But, regardless of how obtrusive padding is, I really, strongly prefer unpadded bras in general. And, I think Effuniak’s unpadded lace designs are gorgeous! Due to the size inaccuracies, I missed out on some models I really liked, like the Halfek models (no longer available in my size.)

I know many other people have had great experiences with Ewa Michalak bras, and I was so hoping to be one of them! I do want to stress that I don’t think this means that Effuniak bras are poorly made, or that they are a bad company. So many ladies have found Effuniak bras to be their absolute dream bras, that they are clearly doing something right! I do think, though, that they should revise their size calculator right away. I know I am not the only person for whom it has been grossly inaccurate.

The good thing about this experience is that I know now that Effuniak unpadded styles do come in my size, and that is very good to know!

I have dropped these bras in the mail to return them, and now I must wait another agonising couple of weeks to get only some of my money back. I am undecided as to whether I should order another bra from them or not. Part of me says I should get something out of this ordeal, but the other part of me points out that the more times I have to pay for shipping back and forth, the more expensive the bra ends up being. So, I am undecided. I think the Granatowy Motyl bra is absolutely gorgeous, though, so we will see. I plan to send some  pics to Ewa to see what size she would suggest.

12 thoughts on “My First Ewa Michalak Order

  1. I’m so sorry you had a disappointing experience… that level of sizing inconsistency/inaccuracy is pretty bad, especially given all the size and fit information on their website. Hopefully they can suggest a better size for you, and provide more helpful guidelines in general (I still haven’t placed an order because of all the contradictory reports out there).

  2. The calculator was pretty inaccurate for me too (I don’t generally trust bra calculators), which is why I went with my usual size with them (I bought the HP Cielus). I also agree that I don’t find their bands particularly tight, although I’ve only tried one style with them so maybe it depends on the style of bra.

    I think it’s kind of funny that you measured both cups and found the right cup slightly larger than the left cup, because that matches my experience in fit. I’m slightly smaller on my left, so I generally have some wrinkling (in unpadded bras) on that side, but in the EM bra I have, it’s more snug on that side on the top edge. Weird… I’m planning on getting one of their unpadded bras since I like unpadded bras better too.

    • Ironically, I fell for their unpadded styles first and those were what I always wanted. Then I found that they didn’t make them in what they said was “my size.”

      The strange sizing difference in the cups is very curious! They shipped the bras to me folded with one cup tucked inside the other. If they always tuck right into left and sore them in big stacks, could that actually put enough pressure on the wires to make the right cup wider? Or is it some kind of manufacturing thing?

  3. Interesting about the size difference. Most women have one larger boob and it is usually the right one, so that could be a great thing. I only have one Ewa Michalak bra (HP) and I don’t find the band to be particularly tight

    • Is it usually the right one? I have never heard that before. My right boob was actually the smaller one, all my life, until less than two years ago, then suddenly it overtook its neighbor.

  4. So sorry, that Ewa is not for you. I have a variety of her plunges from when I lived in Europe. Maybe her wires are too wide for you? The H one otherwise looked fine to me. What I wanted to know, is if she reimburses you for sending it back? On her website it says it has to be within 20 days which is frankly ridiculous. How much was the shipping and did customs catch it?

    • The wires are not too wide, I do not think; those bras were just too big. There was a LOT of empty space around my breast in the 80H. Same with the 80GG, lots of empty space. When Ewa Michalak’s assistant saw these pictures, though, she said that the 80GG looks like a good fit! Ridiculous!

      I do not think she will reimburse me for sending the package back, so essentially I am out shipping both ways an d have nothing to show for it. I am disappointed.

      I am not sure how much it cost to send them back, my partner dropped them off for me.

  5. The 80H one is definitely too big. But the size 80GG seemed OK in Puder. I’ve heard Effuniak’s cups will shrink a bit after washing, you could try that the next time you have problem with that. And maybe the PL type of their bras would be better for you? The part between boobs (whatever it’s called) is lower, so it won’t be that offensive against your boobs, which I can see are rather close to one another.
    But the size calculator is really strange. It works for some people, but doesn’t for the others. I’m lucky enough to try on her bras in a shop in my city, but some others can only buy online, try on and send back or not. It shouldn’t be such a lottery :/

    • No, the 80GG cup has empty space all around my breast. And you can see that there is a concave spot on top because my breast is not supported. Sad really. Ewa Michalak’s assistant thinks that’s a perfect fit, which rather horrifies me.

      That’s really weird, that you heard they shrink, because almost every review I have read says that they stretch out! Many women have started ordering a cup smaller because of that. You’re lucky to be able to try them on in a shop.

      I especially think that it should not be such a lottery when the size calculator is so off. Now I’ve paid for shipping both ways and I have nothing to show for it. 😦

  6. One idea about the 80GG. Eternal Voyageur had a blog a while ago talking about how the width of the cup can make a bra look too small. She explained it as trying to place an orange in a wide glass, the width keeps the entire orange from fitting into the projection of the cup. So instead of sizing down, you may actually need to size up one in the cup (as indicated by the center gore not laying on your sternum) to get some extra width in the wire. So an 80H. Add that to the fact that the band is too large, and you actually need an entirely different size then those you ordered.
    I’d love to own some Ewa bras, but the shipping to the US and back is really stopping me. Maybe some day.

    • Nah, I definitely need to size down in both cup and band. Because the cup is stiff you can’t see very well in pics, but there was empty space in the cup ALL around my breast. The width of the cups was actually a bit too wide. The center gore was not flat because the band AND cups were too big, there was no tension to keep it against my chest.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s